- LANDR MASTERING REVIEW 320KBPS
- LANDR MASTERING REVIEW PRO
- LANDR MASTERING REVIEW PROFESSIONAL
- LANDR MASTERING REVIEW ZIP
If you need to get your tracks up by tomorrow, for examle (try not to do that to yourself), you might still be able to fulfill on your aggressive deadline.īut that’s not all Landr is for. In a pinch, AI mastering can be a huge help. but it’s true that you might be short on cash by the time you’ve gone through pre-production, tracking, and mixing. Now, I’ve never found mastering overly expensive (somewhere in the range of $50 to $150 per track is common, even if you hire an experienced pro).
LANDR MASTERING REVIEW PROFESSIONAL
Further, Landr mastering is more affordable compared to professional mastering. Because the mastering is handled by AI, the process is incredibly fast. This is exactly what Landr is – an AI mastering tool. Because of the internet, you’ve got access to practically every mastering engineer, across the world, right at our fingertips.īut if that wasn’t enough, you can also take advantage of AI solutions. Today, there are more ways to get your music mastered than ever. So, many musicians know that mastering is important, but don’t know why it’s important, which is why it can easily be consigned to afterthought. But mastering tends to be a bit of a mystery.įurther, most musicians know their music should be mastered, although sometimes forget to budget for it and end up running around like headless chickens when the music they’re working on is fully tracked and mixed. They understand pre-production, tracking, and to an extent, even mixing. Mastering is kind of an abstract process, especially to musicians. Have you ever wanted your music mastered by Artificial Intelligence (AI)? The answer to that question, for most, will probably be, “I’m not sure.” Putting Landr To The Test – Here’s What Happened When I Mastered A Track With Landr.Just terrible! I tried a bunch of settings, and they all sounded worse than the original mix. But LANDR also scooped out mids in all the wrong places, albeit gently. My thought was that all of the LANDR masters sounded close to the original mix, which lacked clarity. I tried low, medium and high intensity settings. I accidentally left a bunch of saturation on in the melda EQ, which smeared the mix, which in turn caused me to add too much 5k(ish) presence. I should have spent some more time on it to avoid silly mistakes. But I think it was still better than landr and aams. It was a quickish master done on cans and not referenced properly.
LANDR MASTERING REVIEW PRO
There are options for controlling EQ in the pro version, which would be interesting to play with. Also, there is an extreme amount of bass distortion. The thing about mastering box though is no matter what you put into it, it all seems to come out the other end sounding the same. This was also my top choice, as it translates extremely well across playback systems. Master #4 was definitely the most popular, and this was also the professonal mastering job. reaper forum got way more responses so I wanted to put this to rest. Once there is a good number of responses, I'll reveal which master is which! I was trying to put the poll up here, but couldn't figure it out. I've got this going here and the Reaper forums.
I also put a little poll on my website at
LANDR MASTERING REVIEW ZIP
I created a Zip of the various audio files along with a Reaper project and put them into google drive.
LANDR MASTERING REVIEW 320KBPS
So, I decided on using High Quality Mp3s encoded at 320kbps using the extreme encoding settings in Reaper. I wanted things to be as real world as possible, but I also wanted the test to be highly accessible. So, I figured I would do a little shoot out using a song I had mastered by a professional Mastering engineer.
The wave of opinions and such on automated mastering seems to range from "amazing!" to "terrible!". I've always been interested in Mastering and the Auto Mastering online services got my attention.
0 kommentar(er)
